Sociology

5Is morality a great power for fond spayIs devotion a force for cordial shift Is worship a force for sociable revisionIs religious belief a force for tender change or conservative cordial force preventing social change ? There are conflicting arguments about this issue hardly all the social scientists regard religion as an meaning(a) social force . Some social theorist is of the discover that religion has a conservative spirit that impedes the right smart of scial change and is inclined toward maintaining the status quo . Whereas some other sociologists are of the conniption that that religion is a substantial radical force that paves the steering for social change To embark on the analysis of the preceding(prenominal) assumption i .e . role of religion in social change , a synopsis of the classical sociologists view of the religion as a force of social change testament be quiet helpful Functionalist viewpoint , for example , of Durkheim presents two prime roles of religion i .e . endorsement and promotion of social solidarity and social integration . This view of religion clearly illustrates that religion is a conservative social force . Karl Marx also labels religion as force that works on preserving the status quo and hinders social change . For Marx , religion is an ideological tool in the hands of the ruling class to justify their rule and monopolize the social control . He further reinforces the idea that religion trust is the sigh of the oppressed creature , the sentiment of a unfeeling world and the soul of soulless conditions . It is the opium of the peopleHe asserts that religion rationalizes the present genius of things i .e possession of land and the domination of knowledge in fraternity ) and vitalizes the notions that this natural is approved by God and unrealizable and sacrilegious for people to alter this natural . In this way it helps the feudal society and maintains social and political status quo hardly another classical sociologist , weber , hold the view that religion is a radical social force .

His assumptions are in Durkheim and Marx Giddens Sociology , 1989 ) observes this distinction in the following way Weber s books on religion differ from those of Durkheim in concentrating on the friendship between religion and social change something to which Durkheim gave little wariness . They contrast with the work of Marx because Weber argues that religion is not needs a conservative force on the contrary , sacredly inspired movements have often produced dramatic social exchangeations Weber bases his empirical suppositions in history and draws his conclusion from investigation of divers(a) societies . He is of the view that ideological impulsion needed to transform the society according to new forms and necessities , was provided by religious ideas . He provides the example that Calvinist ideology provided appropriate impetus for the social , political and particularly economical change and transformed the society from Feudalism to CapitalismWeber asserts that clique of Calvin believed in the notion that a hotshot individual could not perform good works or do acts of faith to guarantee one s place in heaven...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper