NameProfessorSubjectDateHappinessCan happiness be really measured let merely attainable ? Or is it just a state that an someone may aspire for but can never really have ? If an private achieves happiness , there argon however a number of subjective interpretations on how would a mortal define happiness . There are extents that are unlike in individuals and happiness is not an entirely ecumenical sentiment - happiness is known to the world but the concept in which it is understood is subjective to the individual However , it is a plight in rationalizing the concept of happiness . How does one know to be happy ? Is happiness bed on material , strong-arm gratification or a far greater accord beyond the limitations of visible needs ? Does love necessarily equalize happiness ? To quantify happiness in the maven of physical satisfaction means that it can be measured and short-lived . Can happiness be defined as an absence seizure of problem or misery ? The early Greek philosophical school of unemotionalism is often misinterpreted as a clay of belief that is void or bereft of any sense of pain since Stoic teachings necessarily espouses freedom without passion finished reason . Stoics did not necessarily remove emotions but rather to purify their thought to have clear judgment - the initiative precepts of rational thought wherein emotions cloud the process of thinking . Plato and Socrates similarly espoused such ideologies into their system of thought where Stoic reflection , system of logic , and concentration are methods leading to fuller realization of good and moral values in intent . Stoic teachings in addition emphasized on reason as a elan of understanding universal reason or the logos that is intrinsic in everything . Passion in its ancient definition is fretting or suffering reacting to physical or external events which add up to incorrect judgment . From this , reason and virtue is needed in to live a harmonious life in similarity to the universal and pervading of all things .
The four virtues as found in the teachings of Plato are wisdom courage , justice , and temperance (Morgan , 72 . By possessing these virtues , the individual leads a harmonious and happy life . Consequently Stoics argued that unhappiness and evil results from ignorance . This ignorance is based on the familiarity of the natural of things , that if a person is unhappy , it is because the individual has disregarded or refuses to know how nature functions . This means that as an individual part of a greater natural , realizes the good of the universal through knowing and reasonThe ideologies of Epictetus concerning happiness is based on the Stoic system of thought wherein happiness is achieved through leading a virtuous life . He emphasized on freedom , morality and the value of humanity , arguing that humans are irrational beings and should delimit the self from attaining worldly pleasures and submit to the actor of fate . Though it contradicts the argument on the value of survival in the individual , Epictetus furthers the argument with the thorough understanding of weft - that the choice in viewing or interpreting divers(prenominal) events leads to a...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment