Finally, J. give tongue to that it was more essential in making this kind of decision to find emerge whether something it legally ill-use and he noted that it is to a fault wrong to do anything that breaks the law.
The adolescent thought that Heinz lickly should steal the drug whether he loved his wife or not. She said that the charwoman was his wife and he should do everything possible to save her life. She also said that it was not fair for the druggist to charge so much m 1y, when it did not cost him that much. She felt that the druggist was in the wrong, because he would not make any arrangements with Heinz to save his wife's life.
She was not as current if Heinz should steal the drug to save a alien or a pet. She said that she did not go through if she could give a good answer, but she thought that Heinz should not steal the drug in these instances. Here, he was liable to go to jail for a stranger or a pet, and that did not seem quite right to her. It did not make sense.
As for decision-making, L. thought that the law should be the same thing as what is morally righ
The adolescent's reasoning is also partially explicable by her age. She is uncertain. She is still finding out her identity and exploring her beliefs. She is confused and her reasoning exhibits this. She is not yet authorized what she mobilises, what her values are, and how to apply them.
She was confused about the last question. She said that perchance it is wrong to do something that breaks the law, but it can also be the right decision to do something that breaks the law. She said that maybe there are two different kinds of law and one kind is higher than the other(a) kind. But, who was to decide this. She was not sure of that.
On the other hand, there is more complexity in the reasoning of the adolescent girl, which makes it more difficult to establish her stage. For example, she is clear that Heinz ought to save the life of his wife, loved or unloved, which could indicate a State 4 or Stage 6 orientation. However, since she did not really think he should save either the stranger or the pet, although confused about that, that places her more at a Stage 4 level. On the other hand, she seems headed toward a postconventional position, because she sees that there are complications. She indicated that there may be two kinds of laws, with one of them higher, although she was not sure who should decide on this. So, she is thinking toward take aim III: Postconventional thinking of some sort, although currently probably at Stage 4.
In terms of the stranger, she did not think that Heinz should steal the drug, because it was not his difference. He did not belong involved in that situation, but should stay out of it. She also did not think he should steal the drug, because it was just a pet, and furthermore, it might not be that important to him.
One of the obvious critiques of Kohlberg's theory is that it is a hierarchical stage theory. These assume that there is a emanation to development, and that certain stages are superior to other stages. In other w
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
No comments:
Post a Comment