Evidence of Neocolonialism in African Trade Relations Essay

Athow Brian and Robert G. Blanton present their conceive of African pile relations in front and after European colonialism in colonial Style and compound Legacies Trade Patterns in British and french Africa. This study is rather important as it is an effort to scientifically assess the colonial conduct bequest in a comparative manner. In fact, it is the only research of its kind analyzing trade relations of previously annex states of Africa surrounded by 1938 and 1985. The authors closing is to disc over whether neocolonialism waits to exist in the previously colonise African states with respect to trade relations.In some other words, do the previously colonized African states traverse to depend on the colonialists for trade? The underdevelopment of Africa is traceable to many factors, including the fact that it takes economically the right way governments with a strong mavin of their goals to pass their people and develop nations. It is a known fact that the Eur opean colonialists had their own interests at heart. Their mercenary objectives could not accommodate the goal of developing Africa. African states that came to be command by Europeans were forced to produce outlandish goods as well as new materials to meet European demands alone.The traditional coarse economies of the colonized states of Africa were forced by French and British colonialists to start specializing in cash crops that were solely meant for exporting. Although the French and British colonialists came to abide significant political power over the African people, the local needs of the latter(prenominal) were utterly disregarded. No wonder, although Africa continues to appear sousing green to the human eye, its people consent to from double-dyed(a) hunger. After all, their needs give way been disregarded even after emancipation was attained from the European colonialists.As a matter of fact, the authors of colonial Style and Colonial Legacies found that the Af rican states that were previously colonized by the French continue to receive France as their chief trading partner. Similarly, African states that were previously colonized by the British continue to trade with the British in addition to other states that had been colonized by the British. What is more, the trading style of the colonialists continues to be utilise by the African states that were colonized by the French and the British. French colonies of Africa were under a centralized regularization.For this reason, they continue to con berthr France as their chief trading partner. British rule was decentralized to a large extent. Moreover, the British had already established trade relations between the African colonized states and other nations across the world that had been colonized by the British. These trading patterns continue to this day, which is the reason why the authors of Colonial Style and Colonial Legacies key to neocolonialism in African trade relations. corres pond to the authors, old habits die hard.Africa continues to suffer from severe poverty because its resources do not body forth the Africans. Rather, previously colonized African states continue to produce for the French and the British peoples. Africans be dependent on the moneys they receive for the goods they export to France and Britain, in addition to previously colonized British states in other move of the world. Seeing that Africa appears to be on the losing side of this deal, the article, Colonial Style and Colonial Legacies calls for wide structural changes in the political and trade patterns applied in Africa today.It would take African governments to develop a strong sense of their goals to achieve economic independence for the Africans this time having the interests of their own people at heart.BibliographyBrian, Athow, and Robert G. Blanton. Colonial Style and Colonial Legacies Trade Patterns in British and French Africa. Journal of third gear World Studies (Fal l 2002). Available from http//findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_qa3821/is_200210/ai_n9134671. earnings accessed 27 November 2008.