Progressivism Misery of the Masses

Progressivism - distress of the Masses\n\n[i:7a88bc7b81]Question: How did winives redefine pauperisation? Why was that important? Where and wherefore did progressive solutions for the problems of pauperism evanesce short?\n\nIf there was peerless period of American muniment that could be labeled the or so influential or structural to the reality of our society today, maybe it would be the Progressive endeavour. A reason may be progressives were not against the American system, they barely wanted to fix it. They believed strongly in the good of humanity, fairness, and regulation. rightfully conservatives at heart, they wanted to render back to the days of equality of opportunity, democracy, and social justice. Equality, fairness, opportunity every last(predicate)(prenominal) predominately applied to the poor vicece they were close to similarly the ones being taken advantage of. In barge of scantness progressives, however, had a more different view than the si n of the individual. Poverty, in their eyes, was verbatimly link up to the environment and opportunities an individual was presented with. This watch was important because it was at the root of all the reforms progressives lobbied for. However marvelous and good-hearted the efforts of progressives were to eliminate poverty, they were attach to with mis-education and poor treatments.\n\nThe Progressive views of poverty are fairly elementary: poverty is the product of failures of the regime and the environment it creates. Driven by social justice, people like Jacob Riis showed the grim reality of poverty to the rest of the world. In this fussy case, he used photographs to powerfully illustrate the effects from abuses of an industrial society. Riis and others like Jane Addams, Theodore Dreiser, and Frank Norris all took up the cause for the broken and created sympathy for the less fortunate. The volume of progressives steered away from the issue of self sin that brought abou t approximately of the evils of society they were fighting against: alcoholism, corruption, prostitution, and medicate abuse. This again fuses the idea that the sustenance of the poor was a direct product of the environment in which they lived.\n\nBecause of the secular way progressives looked at the poor, they used unorthodox and innovative methods rather than the evangelical way of the past great awakenings. The progress of social service move from the settlement house movement to the social worker which was act full...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.