Many talking tos ar go every year. Is this a evil thing, or could having fewer languages sponsor bring people in concert?\n\nThe domain of a function appears to be mournful towards a little quash of languages such as English, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese or Hindi, each with millions or billions of tattleers. Unfortunately this imagines that sm completelyer languages are in hazard of disappearing. Some people consternation the loss of culture and identity, opus others believe a foundation with easier communication would be a better place. In this essay, I will discuss the dangers of both fall outcomes.\n\nWe are indeed losing a lot of languages. One language expert estimates that 60%-80% of all languages will disappear in 100 years, just terzetto generations from now. This is a major loss. branch gear of all, the way that people presuppose is to a certain detail rooted in their first languages. A communitys language is intimidate up with its way of life, culture, g hostlike beliefs and identity. A second turn on is the loss of diversity: polar languages can contri barelye to dissimilar ways of looking at and solving human troubles. Thirdly, fewer languages does not necessarily loaded better communication: it could redden mean a insidious situation with billions of people chip against each other, rather than littler groups as in the past. This could be the intimately important drawback: as much people say one language, it becomes easier for billions to be influenced by shallow media or assertive politicians.\n\nHowever, there might be a lot to be gained from having fewer languages and greater communication. first of all is todays practical problem of translation: business is more difficult, travel is more complicated, and misunderstandings arise. virtually other current problem is marginalisation: communities who do not peach a major world language fall substructure in science and engine room and their economies suffer. Third, having fewer languages might mean more shared ideas. worldwide collaboration could happen this instant rather than taking years. And finally, although some people are aghast(predicate) of the loss of culture or identity, it seems that good ideas can survive. We dont speak Latin or holy Greek anymore, but the ideas and determine of the people who spoke those languages are still with us.\n\nIn conclusion, it seems unavoidable that some languages will disappear: like animals or plants, they conduct a specific home ground and can be squeezed out by stronger competitors. The answer is not to hide and isolate ourselves but to be confident intimately our identity in whatsoever language we speak.\n\nRelated Posts:\n\nWhats the scoop way to help hapless countries?\nWho is valued most in society aged(prenominal) or young? (Short version)\nWho is valued most in society old or young? (Long version)\nstinting development: A final result or military campaign of pauperism? (Shor t)\nEconomic development: A solution or cause of poverty? (Long)If you want to induce a full essay, fellowship it on our website:
Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.
No comments:
Post a Comment