Ethical Relativism tells us that our incorrupt beliefs tend to reflect the subtlety in which we grew up in. If this is so, in that location crapper be no familiar clean standards for us to adhere to as nearly respectable theories such as Kantianism would have us believe. Because people in different societies make different honorableistic judg custodyts regarding the same action, the joust seems to be, they must accept different moral standards. If this is true, there can be no universal moral standards. This then leads to the head that destinations are chastely infallible; afterwards all, if cultures make the moral laws, cultures can do no revile. M any(prenominal) antiquities cultures as healthful as modern, follow this idea to virtually degree. For example, in India some cultures believe it is morally permissible for wives to be burned existent along with their dead economises on a funeral pyre. According to Hindi culture, a widow is required to get alon g the funeral of her dead husband and be cremated existing with his dead corps. excessively according to Hindu culture, if a widows husband died far forth from home, or in another country, she is to be burned alive on the funeral pyre by herself. Many Hindu men refer this act as virtuous and sanctified, I however, would describe it as a moral transgression, practiced by a society with no feasible concept of moral consciousness. To verify I disagree with this because its morally premature in my culture would be accepting the system of ethical relativism & I simply cant do that. I believe this act is wrong because I believe that there are such things as universal moral standards. object lesson standards in which murder is wrong, the depravity and subjugation of women or any human being is wrong and I believe these things to be self-evident... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
I! f you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment