Monday, 8 April 2013

WVO Quine: Two Dogmas of Empiricism. A summary of Quine's problems with Carnap's philosophy.

In his Two Dogmas of Empiricism, Quine addresses what he views as problematic claims made by Carnap. The first problem Quine has with Carnaps epistemology is about his definition of state- expositions. The problem is in deuce partings: first Quine says that Carnaps version of uninflectedity is conditional, because it requires atomic sentences in a language to be mutually independent. The second part of the problem is that, Carnaps attempt to explore analyticity by way of his state-descriptions results in a problematic definition of analyticity, which ends up being more than indicative of crystal clear truth. In conclusion, Quine presents a solution to his problems with Carnap positing that the bounds between synthetic and analytic is imagined.

In his attempt to define analyticity Quine encounters a problematic attempt at defining the term, by Carnap. Carnap has tended to exempt analyticity by appeal to what he calls state-descriptions(195). Carnaps state-descriptions are problematic for two reasons; one reason is that a statement is ... explained as analytic when it comes out true under every state description(195), this necessitates every atomic sentence to be mutually independent- core that two statements that mean the same thing are supposed(a) to exist as two completely separate meanings.

Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!

However, as Quine points out this would mean there would be a state-description which designate truth to John is a bachelor and falsity to John is married, and consequently All bachelors are married would drama out synthetic rather than analytic under the proposed standard(195). This truth gives rise to the second problem of Carnaps state-descriptions, that analyticity as it refers to state-descriptions completely works for languages that do not contain synonymous wrangling such as bachelor and unmarried. So, Quine submits that Carnaps state-descriptions are indicative of logical truth, not of analyticity.

To generalize, these problems that Quine has with Carnaps philosophical system...

If you want to get a safe essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment