Both denim Jacques Rousseau and Saint Augustine present two distinct, yet co-related accounts of the while being and the consequences of unrestrained homophile desire. All were great philosophers of their time, who offered unhomogeneous standpoints concerning the state of humankind nature. These great thinkers differed and shared certain similarities regarding their thoughts on the nature of the human being. Thus the purpose of this paper is to define forward a critical examination of the work of Augustine and dungaree Rousseau and to prove without a doubt, in regards to the troubles of modern day man and significant events, that Saint Augustines views toward mankind was in actuality a more than accurate descriptive account. Saint Augustine offers a more tenable solution to the troubles that plague mankind, in which that we are faced with a divine calling and we need to listen to that call.
Saint Augustine and Jean Rousseau presents specific varying views on the original state of the human being. Saint Augustine attempts to answer the question, what does it mean to be a human being? Throughout Augustines life, he was in pursuit of something he did not know, this void in his life that he could not comprehend.
Thus in this pursuit of happiness, Augustine eventually completely gave in to the desires of flesh, by engaging in various sexual activities and new(prenominal) sinful activities of the flesh. However, in the end, Augustine realized that nothing could fulfill that void, barely for God. Human beings are the ultimate God seekers. We are eternally seeking something to fulfill that void in our life; there is always this hunger inside of us for meaning and understanding. As humans we are always discontent and in perpetually seeking of fulfillment, and we tend to seek fulfillment and pleasure through ?finite goods? such as money,
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment