War, Politics, Castigli adept, and Machiavelli         During the Renaissance period, galore(postnominal) great minds expressed their caprices and talents to their fullest potential. Neither Baldesar Castigli whiz nor Niccoló Machiavelli were exceptions. In Castigli ones greatest work, The Book of the Courtier, he describes the qualities that should be have by the perfect courtier in a compilation of constitute conversations between the members of the court of Urbino. In arguably Machiavellis outflank work, The Prince, he sets a number of guidelines that, in his opinion, prospective leadership should follow in order to achieve greatness as a ruler. After studying both of these important pieces, one stack clearly see that Castiglione and Machiavelli do indeed give their own precise views concerning war and politics. If for each one read the an otherwise(prenominal)s book, Castiglione and Machiavelli would in spades have a reply to the ad immorality of one another regarding the topics settle of war, how fair and honest a ruler should be to his raft, and what the just about effective type of government is.
When concerning the idea of the overall purpose of war, Castiglione and Machiavelli would unquestionably have a response to the advice of one another. In The Book of the Courtier, Castiglione states,It is wrong to constantly be at war and not to seek to attain pause as the objectivesome rulers suppose that their principal charge essential be to subjugate their neighbours... (Castiglione, 303) What this statement basically authority is that a leader should not intend to destroy their untoward in war, but that they should fight until peace can be realized. Castiglione gives an example of a society that did not agree with the similar mentality which he did. He explained of the Scythians; a group of mickle who would not allow anyone who had not slain an enemy to fox from the cupat their solemn feasts. This attitude toward war would suffer people to become bellicose and aggressive, according to Castiglione. On the contrary to the view of Castiglione, Machiavelli considered war to be an engagement where one must crush their enemies rather than only attain peace. He states, hands must be either cajoled or crushedfor they leave revenge themselves for slight wrongs, while for the grave ones they cannot. (Machiavelli, 7) In other words, Machiavellis statement means that when fighting the opposition, they must be destroyed to prevent further harm. By examining Machiavellis statement, it is unmistakable that his overall purpose of war is not just to admit peace, but alike to annihilate the enemy to ensure few confrontations in the future. When concerning the idea of the purpose of war, Machiavelli would in all likelihood advise Castiglione to be to a greater extent(prenominal) ruthless and wipe out the enemy. The response that Castiglione would probably offer to Machiavelli is to be more humane and moral, rather than to sample to destroy a nation.
Machiavelli and Castiglione would most likely disagree with the opinions of each other concerning how honest and fair a ruler should be to his people. In The Prince, Machiavelli believes that a prince should have no problem deceiving his people. He states that a prince only needs a fortunate astuteness to win over his people; not luck, courage, or talent. A prince also should show the people some generosity, but not be too generous. Machiavelli also felt if the princes people became too comfortable, then they will tend to try and spud advantage of him. In contrast, Castiglione believed that a prince should possess two things: the start-off is clear insight and judgement, and the second is the issuing the lawful commands in the proper manner, concerning things that are reasonable and within their authority. (Castiglione, 302) These views are in truth different when considering how fair and honest a prince should be to his constituents. If Machiavelli could react to Castigliones opinion he probably would tell him that a prince should think more for himself, and not for the people. Castiglione would perhaps respond to Machiavellis advice by reminding him that the job of a prince is to serve the people.
Machiavelli and Castiglione each possess their own opinion on what type of government is more effective: a body politic or a monarchy. In The Prince, Machiavelli is writing a book for a prince, which is part of a monarchy. Machiavelli also willingly served under princes during his lifetime. In Chapter 5 of The Prince, he also gives advice on how a prince should deal with republics: destroy them. Does this rush him a monarchist? No. Machiavelli also served under republic governments in Florence. In another one of his works, The Discourses, Machiavelli proves to favor a republic. In The Prince, he is only giving advice about how to sour a monarchy; this does not necessarily mean that he prefers one. As for Castiglione, monarchy was indeed his preference for a form of government. I should always prefer the rule of a good prince which was stated in the Fourth Book in The Book of the Courtier. (Castiglione, 296) He also writes at one point,I also claim that it is easier to reveal one good and wise man than to specify many who are such. This quote is stating that he believes it would be easier to find one capable man to be the leader rather than to find an entire group (republic) of capable men to be leaders. Machiavelli would more than likely respond to the advice of Castiglione by telling him why he believed a republic is more effective than a monarchy, and vice versa.
After examining The Book of the Courtier, by Baldesar Castiglione, and The Prince, by Niccoló Machiavelli, one can clearly identify that each men had their own specific views concerning war and politics. If each read the others book, Castiglione and Machiavelli would definitely have a response to the advice of one another regarding the topics of the purpose of war, how fair and honest a ruler should be to his people, and what the most effective type of government is.
If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment